Welfare queens revisted?

TNR’s John Judis makes an important point in a blog post today:

I mention the Bradley effect because I think, too, that McCain and Sarah Palin’s attack against Obama for advocating “spreading the wealth” and for “socialism” and for pronouncing the civil rights revolution a “tragedy” because it didn’t deal with the distribution of wealth is aimed ultimately at white working class undecided voters who would construe “spreading the wealth” as giving their money to blacks. It’s the latest version of Reagan’s “welfare queen” argument from 1980. It if it works, it won’t be because most white Americans actually oppose a progressive income tax, but because they fear that Obama will inordinately favor blacks over them.

TNR’s Noam Scheiber agrees and worries that this racial code is reinforced by media stories about the legions of black voters waiting in line for hours to cast their ballots for Obama.

There doesn’t appear to be much hard evidence to support Judis’ theory except perhaps for some very slight tightening in a few of the national tracking polls (most notably Gallup, Rasmussen, and Zogby) over the last few days. This slight tightening could just be statistical noise, and it doesn’t really say anything about the electoral college.

Still, I’m worried. Why? Because I just spoke to a friend of mine in Florida yesterday. It’s probably fair to describe her as a white Southern moderate. Think Gretchen Wilson’s “Redneck Woman.” She was born and raised in the Deep South and is as country as all get-out. But she’s pro-choice and not a Christian Conservative at all.

I hadn’t spoken to her in a few months, and I asked her what she thought about Palin. Much to my relief, my friend didn’t like Palin at all. She thinks Palin’s unqualified for the job. She told me that she likes McCain but can’t vote for Palin.

I asked her about Obama. She was lukewarm at best. I asked her why. To paraphrase, she said that she doesn’t like the idea of paying taxes so that someone else can sit on their ass and collect a government check. nevermind that my friend doesn’t make enough to have her taxes raised under Obama’s plan. Nevermind that Obama recently added a work requirement to his middle class tax cuts.

Needless to say, it was apparent to me that the McCain camp’s “spreading the wealth” argument resonated with her. Not only that, but it also seemed to me that she was making a connection between “spreading the wealth” and welfare queens. Although she never used the words “welfare” or “queen,” I have no doubt that McCain’s argument had, perhaps on a subconscious level, activated the negative stereotype for black people in her mind.

As anyone who has read Drew Westen’s book, The Political Brain, will recognize, this kind of politics has a long a nearly unblemished record of success. Westen would also say that the way to fight back against racial code words that operate on a subconscious level is to make them conscious and to appeal to our better angels. The Obama camp hasn’t done that yet, and I haven’t seen any indication that he plans to do so.

There may not be enough time for Senator McCain to close the gap in the polls with this kind of subtlety. We’ll see.

Cross-posted from Facebook

On health

The Central Virginia Progressive-The DAVISReport sent us Obama v. McCain on health and wellness, including bills

The article below really breaks down the health care crisis. Comparing both candidates plan, it provides a hyperlink to the non partisan Health Policy Center’s analysis of both candidates proposed plans. An important read on this important issue. click here:
Obama vs. McCain: Medical Bills, Drug Prices and Access to Health Care — Voter Guide | Health and Wellness | AlterNet
The DAVISReport

Comparing positions

The Central Virginia Progressive-The DAVISReport sent us the Obama v. McCain Tax Calculator

Let the numbers speak for themselves. Click on the program below and see how your pocketbook will fare at tax time under each candidate’s plan.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden: Change We Need | Obama Tax Calculator

Suppressing the vote

Protect This Election By Andrew Gumbel

This article appeared in the November 10, 2008 edition of The Nation.

Not so long ago, when Karl Rove was still dreaming of a permanent Republican majority based on his “50 percent plus one” model for fighting and winning elections, 2008 was shaping up as possibly the dirtiest election season yet.

The plan was straightforward: to use every legislative and executive lever available to the GOP to suppress the votes of minorities, students, the poor, the transient and the elderly; and to denounce any attempt by the other side to level the playing field as a monstrous exercise in systemic voter fraud.

A lot of pieces of that plan are still in place and could still pose a threat to the integrity of the November 4 elections if any one of them–a crucial Senate race, say, if not also the race for the presidency–turns out to be remotely close.

Continue . . .

Republican war against voting

The GOP’s Blame-ACORN Game By Peter Dreier & John Atlas This article appeared in the November 10, 2008 edition of The Nation.

An increasingly desperate Republican attack machine has recently identified the community organizing group ACORN as Public Enemy Number One. Among ACORN’s alleged crimes, perhaps the most serious is that it caused, nearly single-handedly, the world’s financial crisis. That’s the fantasy. In the reality-based world, it was ACORN that sounded the alarm about the exploitative lending practices that led to the current mortgage meltdown and financial crisis.

Since the 1970s ACORN, which has 400,000 low- and moderate-income “member families” in more than 100 cities in forty states, has been warning Congress to protect borrowers from the banking industry’s irresponsible, risky and predatory practices–subprime loans, racial discrimination (called “redlining”) and rip-off fees. ACORN has persistently called for stronger regulations on banks, private mortgage companies, mortgage brokers and rating agencies. For years, ACORN has alerted public officials that the industry was hoodwinking many families into taking out risky loans they couldn’t afford and whose fine print they couldn’t understand.

Now John McCain and his fellow conservatives are accusing ACORN of strong-arming Congress and big Wall Street banks into making subprime loans to poor families who couldn’t afford them, thus causing the economic disaster. McCain’s campaign is running a one-and-a-half-minute video that claims Barack Obama once worked for ACORN, repeats the accusation that ACORN is responsible for widespread voter registration fraud and accuses ACORN of “bullying banks, intimidation tactics, and disruption of business.” The ad claims that ACORN “forced banks to issue risky home loans–the same types of loans that caused the financial crisis we’re in today.”

For months, the right-wing echo chamber–bloggers, columnists, editorial writers and TV and radio talk-show hosts–has pitched in with a well-orchestrated campaign to blame the mortgage crisis on ACORN and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), the 1977 anti-redlining law. In a September 27 editorial, the Wall Street Journal wrote that “ACORN has promoted laws like the Community Reinvestment Act, which laid the foundation for the house of cards built out of subprime loans” and then falsely claimed the bailout bill would create a trust fund “pipeline” to fill ACORN’s coffers. On October 14 the Journal‘s lead editorial, Obama and ACORN, described ACORN as a “shady outfit” and accused the group of being “a major contributor to the subprime meltdown by pushing lenders to make home loans on easy terms, conducting ‘strikes’ against banks so they’d lower credit standards.”

Continue . . .

Bring a trash bag to the polls

In my top-10 tips for avoiding problems when you vote, tip #5 was: Don’t wear political attire to the polls.

As I explained,

While some states do allow voters to wear campaign clothing and buttons in the polling place, most states do not. Free speech issues aside, in order to avoid any confusion or delay on Election Day, we recommend that all voters avoid any potential hassles by choosing not to wear political attire to the polls. If you do wear political attire, be prepared to remove it or cover it up with a jacket or poncho if poll workers ask you to do so.

I have yet to hear of any significant problems with this during early voting. Maybe that’s because word is getting out. I hope so. But there could still be problems on Election Day.

Here’s one little thing you can do to help: bring a trash bag to the polls. Anyone who shows up wearing political attire in a state or county that prohibits political attire in the polling place can use the bag as an inexpensive poncho.

Mind you, I don’t think that anyone should have to vote wearing a trash bag. I think that restrictions on passive electioneering are, by and large, ridiculous. But they are what they are, and we should be prepared to deal with them until we can muster the political will to eliminate these stupid restrictions.

The New York Times presidential endorsement

Editorial

Barack Obama for President

Hyperbole is the currency of presidential campaigns, but this year the nation’s future truly hangs in the balance.

The United States is battered and drifting after eight years of President Bush’s failed leadership. He is saddling his successor with two wars, a scarred global image and a government systematically stripped of its ability to protect and help its citizens — whether they are fleeing a hurricane’s floodwaters, searching for affordable health care or struggling to hold on to their homes, jobs, savings and pensions in the midst of a financial crisis that was foretold and preventable.

As tough as the times are, the selection of a new president is easy. After nearly two years of a grueling and ugly campaign, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois has proved that he is the right choice to be the 44th president of the United States.

Continue . . .

“Real Virginia” is changing!

The Central Virginia Progressive-The DAVISReport sent us What The Pfoek?

The attached video from the Daily Show is a hilarious must watch, but also annoying to see how we in Central Virginia are represented to the rest of the country by this woman. FYI- Jon Stewart attended William and Mary so he knows Central Virginia quite well himself. This woman hasn’t been paying attention and she’s living in the past just like the man she’s working for. Central Virginia, what she refers to as “Real Virginia” is changing and changing fast and she either didn’t get the memo or chooses to ignore it.
Pretending we are not trending blue must be getting harder and harder to say with a straight face no matter how much your paid, what with standing room only at Democratic events, a Dem Gov, a Dem Senator, and Mark Warner expected to win in a landslide Nov 4th. to round out the trifecta.
The icing on the cake was Obama’s visit to Richmond today, filling the Coliseum with 7,000 more outside as an overflow crowd. The city was frozen with gridlock and in my 15 years here I have never seen such electricity. Filled with “Real Virginians”, all locals,a real busy day in Richmond Virginia,the Capital of Virginia. Everybody looked pretty real to me, and really really blue……
The DAVISReport
click here for the video: Pfriend or Pfoe? | The Daily Show | Comedy Central