MICHAEL O. ALLEN

Category

Homepage

Read blogs, not newspapers

By HomepageNo Comments

Certainly blogs are the way to go if you want the real story behind the sudden discovery by the United States Justice Department and the FBI that the community organizing group, ACORN, may have perpetrated voter registration fraud.

Josh Marshall over at TalkingPointsMemo really covered the hell out of the U.S. attorney firings story last. He can claim at least one scalp, that of Alberto Gonzalez, the supremely unqualified attorney general. TPM simply leads the way on this story and many others.

So, when the site says over and over and over again that there is more than meet the eye to the mushrooming probe of the community organizing group, ACORN, that it is a politically motivated probe, more Republican dirty tricks, I have to sit up and notice. This has been done before. It was the underlining reason those all those United States attorneys were fired.

David Iglesias, former U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico, has told TPM he is astounded that DOJ would again bring these charges, especially so close to an election.

“I’m astounded that this issue is being trotted out again,” Iglesias told TPMmuckraker. “Based on what I saw in 2004 and 2006, it’s a scare tactic.” In 2006, Iglesias was fired as U.S. attorney thanks partly to his reluctance to pursue voter-fraud cases as aggressively as DOJ wanted — one of several U.S. attorneys fired for inappropriate political reasons, according to a recently released report by DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General.

Iglesias, who has been the most outspoken of the fired U.S. attorneys, went on to say that the FBI’s investigation seemed designed to inappropriately create a “boogeyman” out of voter fraud.

And he added that it “stands to reason” that the investigation was launched in response to GOP complaints. In recent weeks, national Republican figures — including John McCain at last night’s debate — have sought to make an issue out of ACORN’s voter-registration activities.

ACORN has registered 1.3 million voters, most of them Democrats. Republicans need to figure out a way to keep those voters from voting on Nov. 4. That is the reason they’ve raised the hue and cry over registration anomalies that, if they exist, are negligible, at best.

Rather than perpetrating fraud, ACORN is the victim of politically motivated witch-hunt.

The fact, however, is that even if what is alleged is true, it used to be against DOJ policy to bring such lawsuits so close to an election. Bush’s politicized Justice Dept. changed the rule in May 2007 so they could bring such lawsuits on the eve of elections.

Removed from the rules is this crucial passage:

“The Justice Department generally does not favor prosecution of isolated fraudulent voting transactions. This is based in part on constitutional issues that arise when federal jurisdiction is asserted in matters having only a minimal impact on the integrity of the voting process.”

U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-VT), was livid discussing this with Republican sewer rat Bradley Schlozman.

John McCain, the floundering Republican presidential candidate, brought up ACORN during the last presidential debate on Wednesday, asking Sen. Barack Obama, his Democratic opponent to disclose the full extent of his relationship with ACORN. The group, he said with a straight face, was “on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country.”

I cannot wait for McCain’s political career to be over. He is the greatest fraud in American political history.

Conyers’ letter

By HomepageNo Comments

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr., (D-Michigan), wrote a letter to AG Michael Mukasey and FBI Director John Mueller on Thursday to let them know that he’s watching their disgraceful investigation of the community organizing group ACORN. Here’s a link to the letter: conyers081016

Excerpts:

It is with shock and disappointment that I read today’s Associated Press report that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has opened and leaked an investigation into whether ACORN, a longstanding and well regarded organization that fights for the poor and working class, is involved in nationwide voter fraud.

As an initial matter, it is simply unacceptable that such information would be leaked during the very peak of the election season. Such leaks of information about ongoing criminal investigation matters are always inappropriate, and likely violate the provisions of the U.S.

*   *   *

Moreover, this news is all the more troubling in light of the proven wrongdoing at the Justice Department in the United States Attorneys scandal. As you are aware, there is extensive evidence that political operatives improperly pressured United States Attorneys to investigate and prosecute spurious claims of vote fraud in close proximity to an election. When some did not, they were terminated. Thus, one must view the timing of this extraordinary leak with added suspicion, given that it comes less than 24 hours after the Republican Presidential candidate raised these allegations in a nationally televised debate.

I know that it has become a right-wing cottage industry to cry wolf over alleged “voter fraud” during an election season (only to have such claims evaporate after the election has concluded). Indeed, using superlatives that would make P.T. Barnum blush, Senator John McCain, the Republican Presidential candidate, said in the debate last night, that ACORN “is now on the verge of maybe perpetuating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy.” One would hope the Justice Department and FBI would more skeptically examine such sensational accusations than some cable news outlets. And this is particularly true where the allegations, even given their fullest reading, simply do not support such alarmist and unreasonable claims.

*   *   *

At the same time, numerous allegations have emerged that political operatives are engaged in supression of eligible voters and this activity has apparently failed to receive the intense attention that the federal government is now reportedly devoting to ACORN. For example, there are reports that the chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County, Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, has planned to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day. Additionally, the Columbus Dispatch reports that the Ohio GOP in Franklin County, “has not ruled out challenging voters before the election due to foreclosure-related address issues.

Mukasey let it be known during his confirmation hearing that his Justice Department would not follow the rule of law. But, what about Mueller?

He has made gestures in the past that he wanted no part of being a henchman, that he would restore luster to the Federal Bureau of Investigations as a premier law enforcement organization. He should not be part of this investigation, which stinks to high heavens, on the eve of one of the most important presidential and Congressional elections in our nation’s history.

From Deborah’s blog to God’s . . .

By HomepageNo Comments

My Facebook friend Deborah White (her blog is called Deborah’s US Liberal Politics Blog) has followed the campaigns, watched all the debates, done the research, and come up with Five Reasons Why McCain Will Lose the ’08 Election, Thursday October 16, 2008

Barack Obama decisively won all three presidential debates because of his many thoughtful programs for middle-class Americans, his stance on the ending the Iraq War and bringing U.S. combat troops home… and because of his agreeable, chameleon-like ability to represent many good things for a great many people.

But John McCain also lost the debates due to many factors entirely independent of Barack Obama. And because of these factors, Sen. McCain is quite likely to lose the presidential election in 19 days.

I’ve narrowed the lengthy list of self-induced reasons that will cause McCain to lose the ’08 presidential race down to five main factors.

Take a few minutes to read Five Reasons Why McCain Will Lose the ’08 Election, and let me know if you agree or disagree.

Bamboozling ACORN

By HomepageNo Comments

Just in case anyone had any doubt that George W. Bush’s highly politicized Justice Department is up to its old tricks in the raids and investigation of ACORN’s voter registration efforts, TalkingPointsMemo posted a video of a similar initiative back in 2006.

The scumbag du jour was Bradley Schlozman, a thug with a history of intimidating voters from voting, especially minority voters. It was almost cruel watching this worm squirm under the glare of U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-VT). But the right wing noise has taken up the cry about ACORN and that’s all we’re going to hear from now until Election Day.

ACORN happens to be made up of minority community organizers that the Justice Dept. and the FBI is used to intimidating close to an election. They are sending a message to minorities: You can vote on Election Day but it ain’t gonna be easy.

‘Joe the Liar’

By HomepageNo Comments

(Photo: Jim Young/Reuters) Wurzelbacher speaking to Sen. Barack Obama about taxes while the candidate campaigned near Toledo, Ohio, last week.

And so “Joe the Plumber” dies a swift, ignominious death.

In so doing, he enters the pantheon of fictitious Republican agitprop–such as Reagan’s apocryphal Cadillac-driving welfare queens–that have no basis in reality.

“Joe the Plumber,” you will remember, is the close-minded gentleman who stopped Sen. Barack Obama on the campaign trail in Ohio last week to ask about his taxes.

“I am getting ready to buy a company that makes $250,000 to $280,000 a year,” ‘Joe the Plumber’ asked. “Your new tax plan is going to tax me more, isn’t it?”

The candidate patiently explained his tax plan. But it did not stop newspaper headline writers from  demonizing Sen. Obama. And John McCain, the Republican nominee, then made sure Joe the Plumber would live on in infamy by bringing up the encounter during Wednesday night’s final presidential debate.

He flogged Mr. Obama with the plumber with some success, about the only argument with which he gained some traction all night.

But that was yesterday. This is today. The New York Times followed up and, it turns out, “Joe the Plumber” is not all he claimed to be:

Turns out that ‘Joe the Plumber,’ as he became nationally known when Senator John McCain made him a theme at Wednesday night’s third and final presidential debate, may run a plumbing business but he is not a licensed plumber. His full name is Samuel J. Wurzelbacher. And he owes a bit in back taxes.

The premise of his question to Mr. Obama about taxes may also be flawed, according to tax analysts.

The local plumber’s union said Mr. Wurzelbacher does not hold a license either as a plumber or as a contractor.

“He’s basically playing games with the world,” Thomas Joseph, the local’s business manager, told the Times in an interview on Thursday.

Wurzelbacher was interviewed on the Fox News Channel and conservative groups. They seized on these set of words by Mr. Obama:

“I think that when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

McCain came alive during the debate, taunting Obama repeatedly with wanting to take Wurzelbacher’s money and spread it around. After the debate, CBS anchor Katie Couric came calling. She even laughed when Wurzelbacher compared Sen. Obama with the entertainer Sammy Davis Jr., encouraging him to see a job with “Meet the Press.”

“You know, I’ve always wanted to ask one of these guys a question and really corner them and get them to answer a question,” Wurzelbacher told Ms. Couric, “for once instead of tap dancing around it, and unfortunately I asked the question, but I still got a tap dance . . .  almost as good as Sammy Davis Jr.”

Wurzelbacher was nowhere to be found when the New York Times came calling on Thursday. He did not answer messages left on his home phone and there was no answer at his plumbing business.

“All contractors are licensed, and he does not have a license, either as a contractor or a plumber,” Mr. Joseph, the union official, told the Times, citing a search of government records. “I can’t find that he’s ever even applied for any kind of apprenticeship, and he has never belonged to local 189 in Columbus, which is what he claims on his Facebook page.”

According to public records, Mr. Wurzelbacher has been subject to two liens, each over $1,000, one of which –a personal tax lien–is still outstanding.

And his question to Mr. Obama about paying taxes? According to some tax analysts, if Mr. Wurzelbacher’s gross receipts from his business is $250,000–and not his taxable income–then he would not have to pay higher taxes under Mr. Obama’s plan, and probably would be eligible for a tax cut.

The only thing I came away with from watching his encounter with Mr. Obama was how patiently the candidate answer his questions and how close-minded Wurzelbacher seemed. Meanwhile, someone ought to tell Mr. McCain that his poster boy is not what he seems because, as the Times reports, he’s still banging that drum loudly on the campaign trail.

Debate Reaction

By HomepageNo Comments

This was by far the worst debate performance for each candidate.

Senator Obama was flat and professorial for most of the night. He was clearly in run-out-the-clock mode, wanting to stay cool and avoid any game-changing mistakes. That’s fine as a strategy, but he faltered on execution. Defense does not mean giving long-winded, professorial answers. Even though playing it safe, Obama should have been more focused in his answers, emphasizing values rather than the intellectual underpinnings of his ten-point policy programs. Obama sounded underprepared to me.

On the plus side, Obama worked the camera extremely well. He spoke directly to the people and, at his best, came across as sincere. When Senator McCain spoke, Obama kept his expressions respectful and calm. It was a huge improvement over some of the final primary debates, when Obama looked annoyed when Senator Clinton spoke. Obama also scored a few points with well timed colloquialisms. I particularly liked “use ’em or lose ’em.”

Senator McCain, on the other hand, was a train wreck. Visually, the format could not have been worse for him. It was painful to watch a man so uncomfortable and so openly contemptuous of his opponent. The blinking and rolling of his eyes, the darting of his tongue, and his clear agitation in the seat are not going to serve him well at all. The more people see of McCain up close, the less presidential he looks.

But the more serious problem for McCain was the one that Nate Silver captures here. McCain lost all credibility when he first accused Obama of running the more negative campaign — something that polls say the voters clearly don’t believe — then launched an attack about William Ayers, and then claim that his campaign is all about the economy. It was ridiculous. Undecided voters in TIME’s focus group were laughing at him. Also ridiculous was McCain’s assertion that “of course” he will balance the budget in 4 years. Doesanybody believe that? It was moment of clear desperation.

On the plus side for McCain was his economic argument in the first 20 minutes of the debate. Even after all these years, the Reagan message on taxes and trickle-down economics still resonates. McCain also got off the best soundbite of the night (“I’m not George Bush…”), but even that struck me as not particularly credible coming so late in the game. Obama has already defined McCain with the voters as having supported Bush 90% of the time.

Even though I give a thumbs down to both candidates, Obama was the clear winner because he was much less awful than McCain on visuals alone, and he succeeded in avoiding any game-changing mistakes.

With only 19 days remaining, the dynamics of this race have ossified. I’d expect the RNC to give McCain one last chance to shake things up. If the race doesn’t show signs of changing dramatically in a week or so, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the RNC pull its efforts on the presidential race and focus on saving the Senate seats in Kentucky and Georgia.

Cross-posted from Facebook.

It would be Nice if the Final Debate was a True Debate

By HomepageNo Comments

The Central Virginia Progressive-The DAVISReport sent us this message:

As someone who had the pleasure of coaching and judging competitive debate and forensics, let me begin by saying the previous forums for both presidential and vice presidential debates have been very loose on the rules. It would be so nice if the debate format for the final debate October 15th was followed correctly.

We the audience would then have the opportunity to hear an organized point-counterpoint presentation of the issues within a predetermined time limit free of fluff and confusion.

My wish list is pretty basic and includes:

-Answer the question asked 

-Allow opponent equal time for rebuttal

-Stick to the issues

-Stay in time and don’t ramble

-Shake hands before and after(maintain decorum)

-Stay in one place, look presidential please, (this is a job interview)

Click on this article for more insight: 

How Bob Schieffer can make this year’s final debate interesting. – By Jeff Greenfield – Slate Magazine

The DAVISReport

POSTED BY WWW.EILEENDAVIS.BLOGSPOT.COM THE DAVIS REPORT – THE VOICE OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA AND THE CAPITAL CITY.

Point about . . . what?

By HomepageNo Comments

A snippet from the middle of the Coen brothers’ “O Brother, Where Art Thou”

Pappy O’Daniel sits smoking a cigar, nursing a glass of whiskey, and
soliciting the counsel of his overweight retinue.

PAPPY
Languishing! Goddamn campaign is
languishing! We need a shot inna arm!
Hear me, boys? Inna goddamn ARM!
Election held tomorra, that sonofabitch
Stokes would win it in a walk!

JUNIOR
Well he’s the reform candidate, Daddy.

Pappy narrows his eyes at him, wondering what he’s getting at.

PAPPY
…Yeah?

JUNIOR
Well people like that reform. Maybe we
should get us some.

Pappy whips off his hat and slaps at Junior with it.

PAPPY
I’ll reform you, you soft-headed
sonofabitch! How we gonna run reform
when we’re the damn incumbent!

He glares around the table.

Zat the best idea any you boys can come
up with? REEform?! Weepin’ Jesus on the
cross! Eckard, you may as well start
draftin’ my concession speech right now.

Eckard grunts as he starts to rise.

ECKARD
Okay, Pappy.

Pappy whips him back down with his hat.

PAPPY
I’m just makin’ a point, you stupid
sonofabitch!

ECKARD
Okay, Pappy.

As he settles back Eckard looks around the table and helpfully relays:

Pappy just makin’ a point here, boys.

Update: Trumka’s transcript

By HomepageNo Comments

 

This is a transcript of my post a week ago on AFL-CIO’s Richard Trumka speech on Racism and Obama.

“You see brothers and sisters, there’s not a single good reason for any worker — especially any union member — to vote against Barack Obama.

There’s only one really bad reason to vote against him: because he’s not white.

And I want to talk about that because I saw that for myself during the Pennsylvania primary.

I went back home to vote in Nemacolin and I ran into a woman I’d known for years. She was active in Democratic politics when I was still in grade school.

We got to talking and I asked if she’d made up her mind who she was supporting and she said: ‘Oh absolutely, I’m voting for Hillary, there’s no way I’d ever vote for Obama.’

Well, why’s that? ‘Because he’s a Muslim.’

I told her, ‘That’s not true — he’s as much a Christian as you and me, so what if he’s muslim.’

Then she shook her head and said, ‘He won’t wear an American flag pin.’

I don’t have one on and neither do you.

But, ‘C’mon, he wears one plenty of times. He just says it takes more than wearing a flag pin to be patriotic.’

‘Well, I just don’t trust him.’

Why is that?

Her voice dropped just a bit: ‘Because he’s black.’

I said, ‘Look around. Nemacolin’s a dying town. There’re no jobs here. Kids are moving away because there’s no future here. And here’s a man, Barack Obama, who’s going to fight for people like us and you won’t vote for him because of the color of his skin.’

Brothers and sisters, we can’t tap dance around the fact that there are a lot of folks out there just like that woman.

A lot of them are good union people; they just can’t get past this idea that there’s something wrong with voting for a black man. Well, those of us who know better can’t afford to look the other way.

I’m not one for quoting dead philosophers, but back in the 1700s, Edmund Burke said: ‘All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.’ Well, there’s no evil that’s inflicted more pain and more suffering than racism — and it’s something we in the labor movement have a special responsibility to challenge.

It’s our special responsibility because we know, better than anyone else, how racism is used to divide working people.

We’ve seen how companies set worker against worker — how they throw whites a few extra crumbs off the table and how we all end up losing.

But we’ve seen something else, too. We’ve seen that when we cross that color line and stand together no one can keep us down.

That’s why the CIO was created. That’s why industrial unions were the first to stand up against lynching and segregation. People need to know that it was the Steel Workers Organizing Committee — this union — that was founded on the principal of organizing all workers without regard to race. That’s why the labor movement — imperfect as we are — is the most integrated institution in American life.

I don’t think we should be out there pointing fingers in peoples’ faces and calling them racist; instead we need to educate them that if they care about holding on to their jobs, their health care, their pensions, and their homes — if they care about creating good jobs with clean energy, child care, pay equity for women workers — there’s only going to be one candidate on the ballot this fall who’s on their side… only one candidate who’s going to stand up for their families… only one candidate who’s earned their votes… and his name is Barack Obama!

And come November we are going to elect him president.

And after he’s elected we are going to hit the ground running so that, years from now, we’re going to be able to tell our grandchildren that 2008 was the year this country finally turned its back on men like George Bush and Dick Cheney and John McCain.

We’re going to be able to say that 2008 was the year we started ending the war in Iraq so we could use that money to create new jobs building wind generators, solar collectors, clean coal technology and retrofitting millions of buildings all across this country

We’re going to be able to look back and say that 2008 was the year the tide began to turn against the Rush Limbaughs, the Bill O’Reillys, the Ann Coulters and the right wing hate machine.”