MICHAEL O. ALLEN

Tag

Catholic Church

Redeem yourself *

By HomepageNo Comments

I tried to restrain myself from commenting on Pope Benedict’s visit to the United States. I expected the media would go overboard in its coverage. But, even with his departure, I have to get some things off my chest.

I believe religion has its place and uses, the most relevant of which I think is that it serves as a balm or palliative for troubled souls. Anything people can latch onto to make them cope with our troubled world is always welcomed. But that is not all religion, whatever your faith or denomination, should be.

I’ll acknowledge, of course, that there are institutions of all faiths and denominations that do phenomenal work in the shadows, where people are sick and where they suffer. They uphold the best that we should expect of the faithful.

What I also know is that religion has been the cause of much suffering in the world.

Which brings me to the subject of Pope Benedict’s visit to the U.S. I must not believe in redemption because certain things I don’t think you should not be able to overcome. Among those I would include youthful dalliance with Nazism (although I did have my own dalliances–with Catholicism and Islam, not Nazism–as a youth but a word or two on those later).

Joseph Alois Ratzinger was a former Hitler Youth. His supporters insist membership in the Hitler Youth was required of all 14-year-old Germans of that awful period and that Ratzinger was an unenthusiatic member; moreover, that a cousin of his who had Down Syndrome was killed by Nazis in their eugenics campaign. Ratzinger was drafted into the German anti-aircraft corps at 16 and later trained in the German infantry but was precluded from actual combat because of an illness.

That’s more history than I wanted to get into here. But, this is the thing. Even allowing that Ratzinger regretted his past and atoned for it, which I don’t know that he did either, did he have to become the pope?

He was supposed to be guiding the search for a new pope when–confounding predictions that the next pope would be from the developing world, probably Latin America–he pulled a Cheney and had himself named pope instead.

Ratzinger was always conservative but the Catholic Church needed change–doctrines about marriage, celibacy and the priesthood, women ordination, gay rights, abortion, and a host of other issues–and he was unlikely agent of change. He hasn’t been. Church doctrines have been just as destructive under his papacy.

There isn’t much to say about my dalliance with Islam. As a boy, I partook in the festivities when Muslims break their fast during the Ramadan season. I appreciated but did not try to convert to, or even learn the religion.

Catholicism was another matter. I very nearly converted to Catholicism, all on account of a boyhood crush on a neighborhood girl. My family in Africa when I was growing up was Baptist. I was raised in the church, and I graduated from a Baptist high school.

I fell into deep infatuation with a girl when I was about 10 years old. Besides the fact that she was Ibo and I was Yoruba, she was also Catholic to my Baptist. So, of course, I started going to her church.

Not only that, I started taking Catechism classes because she took communion and it was something I wanted to share with her. The studies went well enough, I memorized all the prayers:

“Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee. Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.
“Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.”

And so on and so forth.

I lived in deep poverty in those days and I remember much of my life in Africa being full of turmoil. The time I was besotted with the girl and Catholicism I remember as being relatively happy and peaceful. The church and its practiced rituals comforted me. The happiness came from plays I wrote, child plays really, and on dulcet evenings, we would perform for family and friends.

I was always the hero in the plays and she my heroine.

I don’t remember exactly how this period ended, except that just before the baptismal mass, when I would take my first communion as a Catholic, I fell violently ill. By the time I recovered I no longer wanted to be a Catholic (I believe, also, that the girl moved away from the neighborhood and, with my her gone, so did my ardor for the Catholic church).

But, in forsaking the Catholic Church, I did not exactly return to my church.

Partly for my grandmother, who I adored, I attended church services devotedly during my adolescence and youth and participated in other activities at church. But I had questions that no one in my church or my high school scripture union could answer. When I left high school and moved away from home, eventually arriving in the United States as a 16-year-old, a time when no one compelled me to go to church, I stopped going to church regularly.

Often when I have found myself in church in the intervening years, it was often on assignment as a newspaper reporter. I have returned to this or that church occassionaly to worship (the Riverside Church was the last one a few years ago) but left still questioning, still not having answers.

This wasn’t the overriding question that pushed me away from the Christian church all these years but it is one I want to ask at the moment:

Why is there so much suffering in this world?

Hizzoner’s Relationship Not Private Affair by JIM DWYER

By Homepage, New York Daily NewsNo Comments

Sunday, May 07, 2000

Last fall, a Daily News reporter wondered why the mayor had vanished most summer weekends. For years, the mayor made public appearances on Saturdays or Sundays all summer long, so reporter Michael O. Allen asked the mayor’s press office about his schedule.

Because the answers were vague, Allen asked for the mayor’s public calendars.

File a freedom-of-information request, the reporter was told — a classic stalling tactic, but Allen sent in the paperwork.

A few weeks later, he got a call from the press office. Withdraw your official request, and we’ll tell you what you want to know.

Yes, the mayor had cut way back on his weekends.

How come? Speak to deputy mayor so-and-so, the press office told Allen, and he’ll give you what you need.

The deputy mayor said the mayor was taking more private time on weekends to be with his son.

“He’s also got a new love in his life,” the deputy mayor said. He gave a long, theatrical pause.

“It’s called golf.”

We now know the mayor has developed a very close relationship with a woman who is not his wife. He brought her to the party for the New York City Marathon and to be with him on New Year’s Eve in Times Square.

And he apparently stayed at the friend’s beach home in the Hamptons many weekends last summer.

Nothing here calls for Kenneth Starr and a grand jury investigation. While Bill Clinton lied about his involvement with Monica Lewinsky and confessed to being ashamed of himself, the mayor has all but boasted about his involvement with his friend Judi Nathan. She was posing for pictures all week.

Still, anyone who files Giuliani’s nonmarital relationship under the category “purely private” is hallucinating.

When three or four New York City Police detectives have the job of chauffeuring the mayor to liaisons in the Hamptons with his friend, the public life meets the private around the Douglaston exits of the Long Island Expressway. From the city line to Nathan’s condominium in Southampton, it is 75 miles.

“There’d be one or two city Town Cars in the parking lot all weekend,” said a Southampton neighbor of Nathan’s. “These big guys would be in the cars, with the motors running when you went to bed at night, and they’d be there in the morning. There were always at least two, sometimes three or four.”

Not so long ago, a New York City mayor got in trouble for sending city detectives to Long Island. In 1991, when David Dinkins dispatched two detectives to investigate a fire at the home of a friend, Giuliani clucked disapprovingly: “This poor guy gets into trouble every day.”

Last week, I asked the Police Department how much it cost the public to have the current mayor delivered by a police taxi service to his woman friend in Long Island. I wanted to know if helicopters had been used, hotels booked, food paid for, and if there had been any repayment by the mayor for these expenses.

“We never give out details of security,” Police Chief Thomas Fahey said Friday.

“Not details of security,” I said. “This is a request for costs.”

“Then you’ll be able to see which guy made the most overtime and figure out who spent the most time with him,” said Fahey.

“Give the cost information without the names,” I proposed.

“FOIL it,” he said.

“FOIL it” means file a freedom of information request. It would do no good, Fahey assured me, but I should file it anyway.

We argued some more, and then he said to put the questions in writing. I did. Late in the day, his office called back: “The chief wanted me to tell you that our statement is, ‘We’re not responding.'”

Later on, Fahey revised his official answer: “We don’t discuss security.” Of course, some of this is security, and some of it is a taxi service provided to the mayor.

Since the city has chosen to stonewall, we are free to analyze it ourselves. It is fair to say that the cost to the public of the mayor’s personal friendship was at least $200,000, much of that having to do with overtime and the need to dedicate so many detectives making $55,000 to $75,000 annually sitting in a Long Island parking lot.

Naturally, the mayor is entitled to protection, wherever he is. So are his wife and family, who continue to live in Gracie Mansion, the official residence supplied by the public. His wife and children also have police protection and chauffeurs, a reasonable precaution.

What about Judith Nathan? Asked by The News’ John Marzulli if she also receives police protection, Commissioner Howard Safir retorted: “It’s a nice day, isn’t it?”

Whatever the bright line between public and private life, Giuliani long ago declared that his temperament was a force that would shape the city.

And if he were a senator, he has even declared what the standard of public morality should be. In February, he called for the Ten Commandments to be posted in public school classrooms.

“The Ten Commandments is part of our tradition, it’s part of our history,” said Giuliani.

A few weeks later, the mayor and his “very good friend” Judith Nathan marched on St. Patrick’s Day, in a parade where gays are banned for practices seen by the Catholic Church as sinful as, say, adultery.

The wife who shares a public home with the mayor was not in that parade.

3 Nudie Bars Get Shuttered By MICHAEL O. ALLEN and FRANK LOMBARDI, With Mike Claffey, Daily News Staff Writers

By Homepage, New York Daily NewsNo Comments

Sunday, August 02, 1998

The city’s crackdown on sex shops officially got under way this weekend with the padlocking of three topless bars, Mayor Giuliani announced yesterday.

The three were closed Friday as part of at least a dozen enforcement proceedings the city launched against live-sex entertainment premises and book and video stores.

The padlocked bars are: El Coche, 904 Hunts Point Ave., the Bronx; Wiggles, 8814 Avenue D, Brooklyn, and Sharks Go Go Bar, 589 Lincoln Ave., Staten Island.

The closure of Sharks, a topless club in residential Midland Beach, was greeted with relief by neighbors and parishioners of St. Mary Margaret Catholic Church, which is a block away.

As young children rode bikes on the quiet street, a woman who lives next door to the bar said that patrons sometimes had sex with dancers in cars on the street. She requested anonymity.

Mario Pisciottano, 74, a neighborhood resident on his way to Mass last evening, said, “It’s about time they closed that place. We’ve been fighting to get them out of here for a long time. The only ones complaining are the patrons who have got to hunt for a new place.”

Pisciottano said the brick building had housed a neighborhood bar until its owners converted the place into a strip club almost 10 years ago.

Two bright orange stickers on the bar’s metal gate announced that the place was “closed by court order.”

The orders were obtained from state Supreme Court justices under the city’s nuisance-abatement procedures a civil process that allows a premise to be padlocked after three separate violations of various laws, including the 1995 sex-shop zoning law.

Under that statute, sex shops are prohibited within 500 feet of residential areas, schools, churches, day care centers and other X-rated businesses.

Though the sex zoning law was enacted in 1995, opponents managed to block enforcement until now through numerous constitutional challenges and appeals that were finally resolved in the city’s favor.

Judges granted temporary closing orders against the three topless bars based on evidence city inspectors and plainclothes cops gathered by posing as customers, according to the mayor and his criminal justice coordinator, Steven Fishner.

Fishner said the sex-enforcement inspectors either saw dancers in a prohibited “state of undress,” or dancing in forbidden ways, such as simulating sex acts.

The city’s enforcement action will now trigger protracted case-by-case litigation that will revolve around specific provisions and definitions in the zoning law, rather than the law’s constitutionality.

For instance, the law covers book or video stores that devote “a substantial portion” of their stock to material featuring “specified sexual activities” of a graphic sexual nature. Lawyers for padlocked shops plan to squabble over each definition.

Giuliani was confident yesterday that the closures marked the beginning of the end of most of the 146 sex shops originally targeted for closing under the sex-zoning law.

“The race here will go to the steady, not the quick,” Giuliani said of the expected court fights triggered by the crackdown.

Herald Price Fahringer, a lawyer who represents most of the endangered X-rated businesses, said the three closed bars are not among his clients. All he would say was, “When they start with my clients, I’ll be ready for them.”

Closing orders against one of his clients, Show World in Times Square around the corner from a Catholic church are to be argued tomorrow.